From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Avoiding rewrite in ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE |
Date: | 2011-01-06 05:42:02 |
Message-ID: | 20110106054202.GB29279@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:24:19AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I still think you're better off focusing first on the case where we
> can skip the whole nine yards, and doing this stuff as a follow-on
> patch. Trying to do too many things, especially possibly
> controversial stuff, especially in the last CommitFest, often ends up
> with the whole patch getting rejected, which makes no one happy.
> Submitting the smallest useful, self-contained change you can and then
> work up from there. Or at least split out the patch into parts that
> can be applied independently, so that if the eventual committer likes
> A but not B you at least get A in.
Will do. Thanks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2011-01-06 06:30:11 | Re: sepgsql contrib module |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-06 05:28:13 | Re: sepgsql contrib module |