Re: Avoiding rewrite in ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Avoiding rewrite in ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE
Date: 2011-01-06 05:42:02
Message-ID: 20110106054202.GB29279@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:24:19AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I still think you're better off focusing first on the case where we
> can skip the whole nine yards, and doing this stuff as a follow-on
> patch. Trying to do too many things, especially possibly
> controversial stuff, especially in the last CommitFest, often ends up
> with the whole patch getting rejected, which makes no one happy.
> Submitting the smallest useful, self-contained change you can and then
> work up from there. Or at least split out the patch into parts that
> can be applied independently, so that if the eventual committer likes
> A but not B you at least get A in.

Will do. Thanks.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2011-01-06 06:30:11 Re: sepgsql contrib module
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-06 05:28:13 Re: sepgsql contrib module