| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Exposing keywords to clients |
| Date: | 2008-05-03 20:00:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20109.1209844851@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> Attached is an updated patch, giving the following output. The catdesc
> column can be translated.
Documentation has got a couple of problems:
> + contains the keyword, the <structfield>catcode</> column contains a
> + category code of 'U' for unknown, 'C' for column name, 'T' for type or
> + function name or 'U' for unreserved. The <structfield>catdesc</>
> + column contains a localised stribg describing the category.
I wouldn't document the "unknown" case at all, much less document it
incorrectly, and you forgot the "reserved" case, and "stribg"?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-03 20:06:54 | Re: Exposing keywords to clients |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-05-03 19:44:56 | Re: Exposing keywords to clients |