Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass?

From:	Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To:	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject:	Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass?
Date:	2010-10-13 18:32:22
Message-ID:	201010131832.o9DIWM701031@momjian.us
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2010-10-13 18:32:22 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>  2010-10-14 01:39:04 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>  2010-10-14 02:15:11 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>  2010-10-14 04:09:35 from Dennis Björklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>   2010-10-14 13:46:16 from Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>  2010-10-14 06:29:25 from Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>  2010-10-16 10:23:12 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>   2010-10-21 21:46:50 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> 📎
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Responses

• Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass? at 2010-10-14 01:39:04 from Andrew Dunstan
• Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass? at 2010-10-14 02:15:11 from Alvaro Herrera
• Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass? at 2010-10-14 04:09:35 from Dennis Björklund
• Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass? at 2010-10-14 06:29:25 from Pavel Golub
• Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass? at 2010-10-16 10:23:12 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Peter Eisentraut	2010-10-13 18:39:36	shmget error text reports funny max_connections numbers
Previous Message	Kevin Grittner	2010-10-13 18:27:01	Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.