Re: is sync rep stalled?

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 07:48:25PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I proposed to implement the "return-immediately" at first because it
> doesn't require standby registration. But if many people think that
> the "wait-forever" is the core rather than the "return-immediately",
> I'll follow them. We can implement the "return-immediately" after
> that.

In my experience, most people who want "synchronous" behavior are
willing to put up with "wait forever," especially when asynchronous
behavior is already available.

In short, +1 for "push 'wait forever' soonest."

Anybody who's got a Secret Base, Hidden in a Hollowed-Out Mountain,
Making Grand Plans While Stroking a Long-Haired Cat[1], should please
to update their public repository, or create a public repository if it
doesn't already exist, and in either case keep it current.

Cheers,
David

[1] While the Hollowed-Out Mountain trick worked back in the 60s,
it's gotten a little trite. The cool kids are keeping things pretty
public these days when they plan to go public.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate