Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited
Date: 2010-09-22 03:31:56
Message-ID: 201009220331.o8M3Vue12542@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Offhand I think I like Andrew's recommendation of a shortlived branch
> > better. In essence your idea is using the tip of "master" itself as a
> > shortlived branch, which is maybe a bit too cute. If you get distracted
>
> True.

However, keep in mind that creating a branch in every existing backpatch
branch is going to create even more backpatching monkey-work.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-22 03:31:59 Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-09-22 03:30:13 Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited