Re: Git conversion status

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This is not even close to matching the tarballs :-(. Seems to be a
> >> locale problem: the diffs look like
> >>
> >> 1c1
> >> < /* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/contrib/citext/citext.sql.in,v 1.3 2008/09/05 18:25:16 tgl Exp $ */
> >> ---
> > /* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/contrib/citext/citext.sql.in,v 1.3 2008-09-05 18:25:16 tgl Exp $ */
>
> > As a curiosity, I do prefer the dashed dates. I have had a number of
> > cases where I have to change dashes to slashes when passing ISO dates as
> > parameters to CVS. Shame they improve it just as we are leaving CVS.
>
> Yeah. It appears that this was prompted by a desire to match ISO style
> going forward. I wouldn't be against that necessarily if we were
> keeping the keywords and not getting rid of them. But since we are
> going to get rid of them going forward, I think what we want this
> conversion to do is match what's in the historical tarballs.

Agreed, no question.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +