From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 9.1alpha1 bundled -- please verify |
Date: | 2010-09-06 20:29:27 |
Message-ID: | 20100906202927.GC1431@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:11:03PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:07:33PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > > On mån, 2010-09-06 at 19:38 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > >> > On lör, 2010-09-04 at 18:35 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > >> >> Announcing on Monday doesn't give us any time to build installers.
> > >> >
> > >> > When are the installers ready?
> > >>
> > >> They're built now, and should be on the CDN & website tomorrow.
> > >
> > > OK, I will send out the announcement tomorrow when I see the installer
> > > on the mirrors.
> >
> > They'll be here as with previous builds:
> > http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pgdevdownload.do
>
> I hate to mention this at this late date, but it just occurred to me
> that the ordering is Alpha, then Beta, then Release Candidates, then
> Release. Did I get that wrong?
Oops. Sorry about the noise. I missed the 9.1 part :P
Thanks to Erik Rijkers on IRC for pointing this out.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2010-09-06 20:32:24 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2010-09-06 20:23:57 | Re: git: uh-oh |