Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
Date: 2010-08-24 18:08:58
Message-ID: 201008241808.o7OI8x505603@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been looking at the open item which belongs with this doc:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/backup-incremental-updated.html
>
> ... and my viewpoint is that the procedure described should be *cut*
> from the official docs and put on the Wiki, with warnings. It's simply
> far too hackish and dependant on DBA understanding of PostgreSQL
> internals to belong in the main docs.
>
> In 9.1 we'll probably have some machinery to make taking snapshots of
> the standby more reliable (like running pg_start_backup on the master),
> and then that procedure will belong in the main docs.

FYI, I am working on a doc update that will use pg_start/stop backup on
the master, as suggested by Fujii Masao:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-08/msg00237.php

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-08-24 18:23:28 Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-08-24 18:04:52 Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item