From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype |
Date: | 2010-07-31 11:08:14 |
Message-ID: | 20100731110814.GS21875@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> After a bit of study of the code, it appears to me that it's not too
> difficult to fix: we just have to use the expression's result type
> rather than the index column's atttypid in the subsequent processing.
> ANALYZE never actually looks at the index column contents (indeed
> cannot, since our index AMs provide no API for extracting the contents),
I don't think it'll be an issue, but just in case- is there any reason
this will cause trouble for the possible index-only quals/scans work?
> So that seems to make it not practical to back-patch.
But we could get it into 9.0..
> I thought of an ugly hack that would avoid an API/ABI break: since
> VacAttrStats.attr is a copy of the pg_attribute data, we could scribble
> on it, changing atttypid, attlen, attbyval, etc to match the index
> expression result type. This seems pretty grotty, but it would allow
> the fix to be back-patched into existing branches.
Yeah, that's rather nasty. :/
> Comments? I'm not sure which way to jump here.
For my 2c- let's get it fixed for 9.0 cleanly and encourage people who
run into this to upgrade to that once it's released. Perhaps I've
missed it, but I don't recall seeing many complaints about this.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-07-31 12:10:33 | Re: review: xml_is_well_formed |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-31 04:40:03 | rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem |