Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Date: 2010-07-10 00:01:55
Message-ID: 201007100001.o6A01to03428@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Rafael Martinez wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/03/2010 01:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> >
> > Also, I think we need to review these images carefully before adding
> > any of them into our docs.
>
> I agree with this. I didn't want to use a lot time with the diagrams
> until everything is decided and we agree to have diagrams in the
> documentation.
>
> They are a proof of concept, different diagram types for different parts
> of the documentation. They all need to be reviewed if they are going to
> be used.
>
> If we go for having diagrams, we should:
>
> - - Create a TODO list with the diagrams we would like to have and where.
> - - Define a procedure and rules to send diagrams patches: how to send,
> review, give feedback, back to send and final commit.
> - - Define some guidelines about how to create a diagram, colors to use,
> key information, etc.

Where are we on this? Application? dia? xfig? Number of colors? Once
we decide these items, we can start adding diagrams.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-10 00:27:23 Re: release-9.0.sgml changes
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2010-07-09 21:24:13 release-9.0.sgml changes