GUC category cleanup (was: vacuum_defer_cleanup_age)

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: GUC category cleanup (was: vacuum_defer_cleanup_age)
Date: 2010-06-15 05:09:54
Message-ID: 20100615140953.C9CE.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> > What's the policy with that, should all the sections in the sample config
> > file and docs have a corresponding enum in config_group_names?
>
> +1. This seems sensible.

Here is a patch to do that. I used terms in the documentation for category
names. Also, some uncategorized variables moved into detailed groups.

Added categories:
Resource Usage / Cost-Based Vacuum Delay
Resource Usage / Background Writer
Resource Usage / Asynchronous Behavior
Write-Ahead Log / Archiving
Write-Ahead Log / Standby Servers

Renamed in the configuration file:
Replication ==> Streaming Replication
Hot Standby ==> Standby Servers

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
guc-category-cleanup_20100615.diff application/octet-stream 14.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-06-15 05:16:38 Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-06-15 04:47:00 Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers