| From: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Open item: slave to standby in docs |
| Date: | 2010-06-04 00:44:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20100604094415.9969.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ther is an open item:
Standby instead of "slave" in documentation
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1273682033.12754.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
I replacesd almost all "slave" to "standby" or "standby servers"
not only in HS+SR but also in other places like third-party tools.
There are still 3 places where "slave" is used.
- Terminology: "... are called standby or slave servers."
- Words in old release notes for 8.2 and 8.4.
Could you check those replacements are proper?
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| slave_to_standby.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2010-06-04 00:47:31 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-06-04 00:32:03 | Re: [PATCH] Fix leaky VIEWs for RLS |