Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Giles Lean <giles(dot)lean(at)pobox(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows
Date: 2010-06-01 22:04:41
Message-ID: 201006012204.o51M4f610858@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Giles Lean <giles(dot)lean(at)pobox(dot)com> wrote:
> > 1. is_relative_to_cwd() I continue to think is a bad name for something
> > ? concerned about ".." (plus on Windows not having a drive letter other
> > ? than the current one); the "normal" meaning of "relative path" is
> > ? merely "not absolute"
>
> Maybe something like is_under_cwd()?

Yeah, is_below_cwd?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-06-01 22:09:51 Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2010-06-01 21:52:57 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: PGDLLEXPORT is __declspec (dllexport) only on MSVC, but is