Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable?

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable?
Date: 2010-05-26 03:32:49
Message-ID: 20100526123249.B287.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:

> >> There is an open item "pg_controldata - machine readable?" in the list:
> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items
> >> Should we add the module to 9.0?
> >
> > No. This is a new feature that wasn't even under consideration,
> > let alone written, at the time of 9.0 feature freeze. It does not
> > get into either core or contrib this time around.
>
> Yup, agreed. That was why I put it on github instead of sending a patch
> to the list. It was also a quick and dirty hack -- maybe it could be
> cleaned up for 9.1, but I'm not sure there was consensus that it was
> really needed.

OK, I moved it from 9.0 open items to new features for 9.1.

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-26 03:36:04 Re: Synchronization levels in SR
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-26 03:19:13 Re: Open Item: invalid declspec for PG_MODULE_MAGIC