Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Date: 2010-05-21 17:58:18
Message-ID: 20100521175818.GB24638@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:45:45PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * David Fetter (david(at)fetter(dot)org) wrote:
> > That is *precisely* the business we need to be in, at least for the
> > languages we ship, and it would behoove us to test languages we don't
> > ship so we can warn people when they don't pass.
>
> k, let's start with something simpler first tho- I'm sure we can pull in
> the glibc regression tests and run them too. You know, just in case
> there's a bug there, somewhere.

That's pretty pure straw man argument. I expect much higher quality
trolling. D-.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2010-05-21 18:04:20 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2010-05-21 17:45:45 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?