Hi,

If a backend killed by pg_terminate_backend(), the backend returns
57P01 which is identical to the one when it's killed by postmaster.

Problem is, pgpool-II needs to trigger failover if postmaster goes
down because apparently pgpool-II cannot use the PostgreSQL server
anymore.

On the otherhand, pg_terminate_backend() just terminates a backend. So
triggering failover is overkill.

Maybe we could make PostgreSQL a little bit smarter so that it returns
a different code than 57P01 when killed by pg_terminate_backend().

Comments?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

Responses

• Re: How to know killed by pg_terminate_backend at 2010-05-13 06:33:06 from Heikki Linnakangas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-05-13 00:48:41
	Subject: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Previous:	From: Brendan Hill	Date: 2010-05-13 00:09:03
	Subject: Re: Query execution plan from 8.3 -> 8.4