Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Date: 2010-04-22 21:14:00
Message-ID: 20100422211400.GD3244@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> (You might want to look back at the archived discussions about how to
> >> avoid storing entries for temp tables in these catalogs; that poses
> >> many of the same issues.)
>
> > Do you happen to know what a good search term might be? I tried
> > searching for things like "pg_class temp tables" and "pg_class
> > temporary tables" and didn't come up with much.
>
> I found this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-07/msg00593.php
> I claimed in that message that there were previous discussions but
> I did not come across them right away.

I vaguely remember that there was a discussion about pg_attribute and
the extra rows for system rows for all tables, which diverged into a
discussion about temp tables and those other extra rows.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-04-22 21:41:29 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2010-04-22 18:39:14 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance