Re: Int64GetDatum

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Int64GetDatum
Date: 2010-04-20 03:03:43
Message-ID: 201004200303.o3K33hw02727@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> writes:
> > I don't know if the build trees can be structured so the include
> > directories can be differentiated the same as the bin and lib...
>
> The RPM distributions are able to deal with this without actually
> differentiating: if you install both 32- and 64-bit RPMs then the
> overlapping files are the same for both, with pg_config.h being
> a stub that does this:
>
> #if defined(__x86_64__)
> #include "pg_config_x86_64.h"
> #elif defined(__i386__)
> #include "pg_config_i386.h"
> ... etc ...
>
> I don't know if Solaris' package management offers the same ability, but
> if it does, then it could be handled like that.

Ah, good idea. Is pg_config.h the only file that varies from 32 to
64-bit?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2010-04-20 03:11:52 Re: Int64GetDatum
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-04-20 03:02:19 Re: Int64GetDatum