| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jim Cox <shakahshakah(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server |
| Date: | 2010-02-23 18:29:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20100223182943.GL3672@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2/23/10 10:14 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >>> What happened to this patch? I don't see any objections, but it was not
> >>> applied.
> >>
> >> I think that the patch author never added it to the open CommitFest
> >> and nobody else thought it was important enough to pick up. It looks
> >> innocuous to me; want to go ahead and apply?
>
> > I'd say yes. It's post-freeze, but this falls into the class of "oops,
> > we forgot about this patch" which the CFs were designed to prevent.
>
> That would be an argument for sticking this in the next CF, not for
> applying it now --- it was submitted after the close of the last CF no?
Sep. 29 2009?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-02-23 18:35:27 | Re: Adding \ev view editor? |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-02-23 18:29:27 | Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen |