| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What does this configure warning mean? |
| Date: | 2010-02-22 19:48:19 |
| Message-ID: | 201002221948.o1MJmJR02552@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > > That's too subtle. I wouldn't figure out what it means if my life
> > > depended on it (then again, it doesn't).
> >
> > Well, "official" made no sense. Bundled seemed similar enough to
> > "tarball". What suggestion do you have?
>
> "tarball" ?
I thought "tarball" was rejected in the discussion:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00832.php
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-22 19:53:08 | Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core) |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-02-22 19:39:46 | Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL |