Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Where are we on this patch? We should at least implement the completion
> > for 'LANGUAGE' in 'DO', and use the existing pg_language query for
> > completion. I am attaching a patch that does exactly this.
> I don't think we need the patch except adding DO to the top-level sql_commands.
> Syntax of DO command is:
> DO code [ LANGUAGE lang_name ]
> We need 'code' before LANGUAGE, but the patch completes "DO" to "DO LANGUAGE".
> It will be just a syntax error.
> Also, we've already had a completion after LANGUAGE (see words_after_create),
> so we don't need an additional Query_for_list_of_languages after LANGUAGE.
Ah, I see. I had not checked the patch against the actual syntax; shame
> BTW, I'm working on psql tab-completion adjustment for new syntax in 9.0.
> I'll send it soon.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-11 00:40:20|
|Subject: Re: log_error_verbosity function display |
|Previous:||From: Marko Tiikkaja||Date: 2010-02-11 00:13:19|
|Subject: Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations|