| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hot standby documentation |
| Date: | 2010-02-09 04:32:31 |
| Message-ID: | 201002090432.o194WVR28031@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Ahh, good point. ?I had not considered the table would change. ?What I
> > did was to mark "Slaves accept read-only queries" as "Hot only".
>
> Can the "warm standby" still reside in v9.0? If not, the mark of
> "Hot only" seems odd for me.
Yes, both hot and warm standby is supported in 9.0.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-09 04:40:33 | Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2010-02-09 04:32:26 | Re: Confusion over Python drivers |