| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator issues |
| Date: | 2010-01-05 16:06:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20100105160649.GG3660@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I liked the idea, but I listed it as item #2 and no one else said they
> > liked it. The only complexity I can see with the idea is that doing an
> > upgrade from one alpha to another would have the same major version
> > number and would therefore not be possible, so maybe we have to use the
> > catalog version number in there.
>
> Good point. Using catversion for the purpose seems a bit ugly but
> I have no better ideas.
I thought we had rejected the idea of being able to migrate between
alphas. Is migrating between major versions not difficult enough?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-05 16:08:01 | Re: pg_migrator issues |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-05 16:06:20 | Re: I: TODO: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values |