| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Subject: | Re: Admission Control Policy |
| Date: | 2009-12-28 21:46:41 |
| Message-ID: | 200912282246.42207.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 28 December 2009 22:39:06 Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 28 déc. 2009 à 21:33, Kevin Grittner a écrit :
> > We often see posts from people who have more active connections than
> > is efficient.
>
> How would your proposal better solve the problem than using pgbouncer?
>
> <mad proposal time>
> I'd be in favor of considering how to get pgbouncer into -core, and now
> that we have Hot Standby maybe implement a mode in which as soon as a
> "real" XID is needed, or maybe upon receiving start transaction read write
> command, the connection is handled transparently to the master. </>
Thats not as easy as it sounds - the master may not have all data needed by
the snapshot on the slave anymore.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-12-28 21:53:02 | Re: Admission Control Policy |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-12-28 21:39:06 | Re: Admission Control Policy |