Re: FSM - per database or per installation?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FSM - per database or per installation?
Date: 2009-12-24 02:07:15
Message-ID: 20091224020715.GB3804@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Craig James wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> >The parameter is gone in 8.4, BTW.
>
> Both max_fsm_relations and max_fsm_pages?

Yes, both are gone.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-12-24 03:32:47 Re: FSM - per database or per installation?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-12-24 02:03:23 Re: FSM - per database or per installation?