Re: Build sizes vs docs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Build sizes vs docs
Date: 2009-12-09 17:12:12
Message-ID: 20091209171212.GE15554@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2009/12/9 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >> Perhaps we should just add it to the release checklist to verify that
> >> they are reasonably correct?
> >
> > Go for it.  Now that you mention it, there are some memory-usage tables
> > in the documentation about shared memory configuration that also have
> > a pretty short half-life, and should be rechecked.
>
> Done.
>
> They're up-to-date per 8.3, btw. Are there changes in 8.4 that should
> be put in? If so, it would be good to include it before the next minor
> release, so the proper data goes up on the website.

At the very least we don't have the FSM bits anymore ...

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-12-09 17:55:05 Re: Clearing global statistics
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-12-09 17:03:35 Re: Build sizes vs docs