Re: A sniffer for the buffer

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: autoramajj(at)hotmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A sniffer for the buffer
Date: 2009-12-08 15:15:51
Message-ID: 20091208151550.GB5057@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith wrote:
> Jonas J wrote:

> >P.S.: I'm using PostgreSQL 8.1.4 to run with TPCC-UVA benchmarks tests...
> Ah. PostgreSQL 8.1 is significantly slower than the current
> versions, and you're not going to get as much help with issues
> related to the source code as if you're using a newer one. For
> example, I don't know the 8.1 buffer implementation code nearly as
> well because I didn't really start tinkering with it until 8.2, so
> some of the things you're asking about I don't have easy access or
> recollection of.

8.1 didn't have lock partitioning, so BufMappingLock was a serious
problem back then. Completely different from the current code.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-08 15:19:37 Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security
Previous Message David P. Quigley 2009-12-08 15:07:24 Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security