Re: operator exclusion constraints

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date: 2009-11-09 19:16:56
Message-ID: 20091109191655.GE3584@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > This is a pretty good short explanation of how to deal with shift/reduce
> > problems in bison. With your permission I'm going to copy it to the Wiki
>
> If you like, but I think the part about figuring out which production
> is the problem seemed to be at least as important for Jeff ...

I agree that it would be worth an entry here
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-11-09 19:31:31 Re: next CommitFest
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-11-09 19:14:10 Re: operator exclusion constraints