From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Dan Colish <dan(at)unencrypted(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |
Date: | 2009-10-01 15:02:03 |
Message-ID: | 20091001150203.GC5607@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
> First, Tom Lane suggested to unify core and ecpg FETCH
> syntaxes so both will accept optional FROM/IN, which I did.
> SQLDA support adds new FETCH forms (Informix-specific
> ones) so naturally these patches clash. There's no simple way
> to make they separately applicable. With the first version,
> the same technical dependency were also there, because of
> the (already explained) grammar problem, I got 2 shift/reduce
> problems in the FETCH/MOVE stmts unless I de-factorized
> FORWARD and BACKWARD out of fetch_direction.
> The new FETCH forms with SQLDA touched the same areas
> in ecpg.addon.
Probably the parts that touch the core grammar can be reviewed and
applied separately.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2009-10-01 15:05:56 | hstore crasesh on 64bit Sparc |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-10-01 14:49:15 | Re: Limit allocated memory per session |