Re: "Hot standby"?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
Subject: Re: "Hot standby"?
Date: 2009-08-11 21:11:28
Message-ID: 200908120011.28975.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 11 August 2009 18:16:04 Gianni Ciolli wrote:
> As for "warm/hot", it depends on what you exactly mean with "get
> ready":
>
> (A) If you mean "it is possible to connect to the second node", then
> Simon's patch is "hot".

Yeah, but by that definiton doing a pg_dump/pg_restore every hour is also
"hot". ;-)

Incidentally, we billed pg_dump as hot backup at some point.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-08-11 21:13:21 Re: "Hot standby"?
Previous Message Gianni Ciolli 2009-08-11 21:04:50 Re: "Hot standby"?