Re: "Hot standby"?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Hot standby"?
Date: 2009-08-11 19:38:54
Message-ID: 20090811193854.GD16362@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Mielke escribió:

> I don't think I was confused before - but I am confused now. :-)
>
> This patch does not provide streaming replication?

No. What it does is allow you to query the slave while it's still
replaying transactions. There's another patch allowing you to do
"stream replication". Hopefully both things could be used
simultaneously.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-08-11 19:49:48 Re: "Hot standby"?
Previous Message Mark Mielke 2009-08-11 19:34:03 Re: "Hot standby"?