Re: Split-up ECPG patches

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: michael(at)fam-meskes(dot)de, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, hs(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: Split-up ECPG patches
Date: 2009-08-07 16:08:00
Message-ID: 20090807160800.GA5290@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Michael Meskes írta:

> > Did you take care of the copyright/licensing issue with sqlda?
>
> I added notice about the PostgreSQL license. Is it ok?
> Or should I resend without indicating the authors?

I think we're normally OK with mentioning the authors, i.e. "Author:
such and such", but the (C) line should attribute copyright to UCB/PGDG.
Michael is free to dictate something else for ECPG of course ...

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Best 2009-08-07 16:08:07 Re: \copy: unexpected response (4)
Previous Message Todd A. Cook 2009-08-07 16:07:41 Re: slow commits with heavy temp table usage in 8.4.0