| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Williamson <gwilliamson39(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications |
| Date: | 2009-08-04 11:03:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20090804110306.GK23840@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* KaiGai Kohei (kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com) wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:18:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Just generally, "access control" is a great way to describe what's
> > actually happening here. That people conflate access control with
> > security has resulted in a number of disasters :P
>
> My concern is "access_control_" is a bit long for prefixes,
> but "ac_" is too short to represent what it is doing.
pg_ac_? Still shorter than 'security_', uses the pg_ prefix, which we
use in a number of other places, and has 'ac' in it..
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tsutomu Yamada | 2009-08-04 11:03:34 | Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-08-04 09:30:40 | Fwd: [BUGS] fix: plpgsql: return query and dropped columns problem |