| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent run coming |
| Date: | 2009-06-10 19:54:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200906101954.n5AJsdA02451@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > Out of curiosity how different is the output if we don't pass the
> > typedef list at all? I'm wondering if the formatting differences are
> > things we actually care much about anyways.
>
> It tends to put extra spaces in variable declarations that are using
> the typedef. Not sure about other effects, but it is kinda ugly when
> you are used to it being right.
Yea, I used a short pgindent typedef list once and people noticed right
away so I had to rerun.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-06-10 20:44:52 | Re: pgindent run coming |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-06-10 19:50:15 | Re: pgindent run coming |