Re: Problems with autovacuum

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Łukasz Jagiełło <lukasz(dot)jagiello(at)gforces(dot)pl>, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problems with autovacuum
Date: 2009-06-09 16:42:34
Message-ID: 20090609164234.GE5938@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>
> > Well, that code isn't even correct I think; you're not supposed to
> > modify a GUC variable directly. I think you should just silently
> > use a naptime of at least X without changing the nominal GUC variable.
> > And definitely without the WARNING --- that's nothing but log spam.
>
> Glitches fixed in this version; will apply shortly to 8.3 and HEAD.

Committed.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-09 16:42:56 Re: Problems with autovacuum
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-06-09 15:48:27 Re: Problems with autovacuum