Re: libpq is not thread safe

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq is not thread safe
Date: 2009-05-30 02:39:25
Message-ID: 200905300239.n4U2dPq11381@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian p??e v ?t 28. 05. 2009 v 17:20 -0400:
>
> > >
> > > Done, patch attached and applied.
> >
> > I went with a <warning> because it seemed most appropriate, but it looks
> > very large:
> >
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/libpq-connect.html
> >
> > Should it be a notice?
>
> I prefer warning. It is important message and beginners usually don't
> know it.

OK.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-05-30 03:48:54 explan refactoring
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-05-30 01:15:37 Re: search_path vs extensions