Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up
Date: 2009-05-28 01:58:55
Message-ID: 20090527225758.G35116@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 27 May 2009, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious as to what is different about these vs all the other
>> tags I've ever done, both before, and after ...
>
> Any chance you tagged, changes were committed, and you then tagged
> files from such a later commit as part of the release, or moved the
> tag to the later commit? Those are perfectly reasonable things to do
> under the CVS philosophy, and not in line with the philosophy of some
> of the other products.
>
> If there's a chance you did that on a couple beta releases in that
> time frame, and on no others, that might explain it.

Actually, I have done that on at least one of the 8.x tags too, so if that
is it, more then those two tags should be causing issues ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-05-28 02:00:56 Re: sun blade 1000 donation
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-05-28 01:58:33 Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions