Re: generic options for explain

From: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: generic options for explain
Date: 2009-05-26 15:03:55
Message-ID: 20090526150355.GA6234@tomas
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 04:36:56PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> > I was thinking something similar, but from the pgAdmin perspective. We
> > already use libxml2, but JSON would introduce another dependency for
> > us.
>
> Yeah, but probably not a huge one. There is one for wx, but I don't
> think it's included by default.

...and to put things into perspective:

tomas(at)floh:~$ apt-cache show libxml2 libjson-glib-1.0-0 | grep "^Size"
Size: 814356
Size: 33538

(not that I would recommend this one, since that's the one tied to glib,
but seems that XML parsing is nearly one and a half orders of magnitude
more complex than JSON).

- -- tomás
who thinks that XML-as-a-data-description-language is a denial of
service attack on us all
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKHATbBcgs9XrR2kYRArJmAJ4wJlvbnuWKYTvIDrSoLJccCyMTLwCbBM39
NCVSrDaEVad3NfogJrwRtiY=
=Volp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2009-05-26 15:15:21 Re: generic options for explain
Previous Message Aidan Van Dyk 2009-05-26 15:02:42 Re: problem with plural-forms