Re: INTERVAL data type and libpq - what format?

From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INTERVAL data type and libpq - what format?
Date: 2009-05-19 10:09:32
Message-ID: 20090519100932.GR22221@samason.me.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:08:37AM +0200, Sebastien FLAESCH wrote:
> I try to use the new 8.4 INTERVAL type with libpq, but get crazy with
> the input formatting rules...

I think you're giving the database conflicting instructions and it's
getting confused.

> fprintf(stdout,"++ Preparing INSERT ...\n");
> paramTypes[0] = 23; /* INT4 */
> paramTypes[1] = 1186; /* INTERVAL */
> paramTypes[2] = 1186; /* INTERVAL */

I don't really know 8.4, but I believe you're saying here that you
explicitly want the values to be of basic INTERVAL type here, i.e. not
INTERVAL DAY TO HOUR for parameter 3.

Thus when you do:

> paramValues[0] = "1";
> paramValues[1] = "-12345 years";
> paramValues[2] = " 123 11:00";
> r = PQexecPrepared(c, "s1", 3, paramValues, NULL, NULL, 0);

It's interpreting " 123 11:00" correctly as a basic INTERVAL value and
then casting it to your more constrained version as you're saving in the
table.

However, when you do:

> paramValues[0] = "2";
> paramValues[1] = "-12345";
> paramValues[2] = " 123 11";
> r = PQexecPrepared(c, "s1", 3, paramValues, NULL, NULL, 0);

You get an error because " 123 11" isn't a valid literal of an
(undecorated) INTERVAL type. I think PG may do the right thing if you
don't specify the types when preparing the query, but haven't tested.

--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond O'Donnell 2009-05-19 10:10:34 Re: Where is tsearch2.sql
Previous Message kelvin273 2009-05-19 10:05:02 Re: my insertion script don't work

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-05-19 11:32:13 Multiple sorts in a query
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2009-05-19 09:57:28 Re: INTERVAL SECOND limited to 59 seconds?