| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
| Date: | 2009-04-22 15:00:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200904221500.n3MF0G915720@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Still, my original proposal was \df[antw][S+]. The extra brackets are
> > obviously redundant, but if we're about providing cues, this is a good
> > cue IMO. It allows the [S+] to match the other lines.
>
> I'm for that too. Bruce was complaining that it'd make the column
> wider, but I don't find that a compelling objection.
OK, I switch to brackets and added separate brackets around the "antw"
options. I changed "PATTERN" to "PATRN" so I would not have to shift
over _every_ other \? option to align properly; patch attached and
applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| /rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 1.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nickolay | 2009-04-22 15:00:52 | BUG #4774: Bug with use execute+xml+xml_encode_special_chars |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-22 14:47:37 | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |