| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Childs <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
| Date: | 2009-04-21 19:26:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20090421192611.GD8123@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
* Scott Marlowe (scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Peter Childs <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hmm Interestingly OSM have just switched from MySQL to PostgreSQL.
>
> On the news blog page it mentioned switching to MonetDB. I saw
> nothing about pgsql there. Do they store it in pgsql for manipulation
> then export to MonetDB?
I thought they had always used PG for some piece of what they're doing,
and just used MySQL for some other piece of it. I'm not sure which is
which though.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-04-21 19:38:49 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-04-21 19:22:31 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-04-21 19:28:28 | Re: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-04-21 19:22:31 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |