| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
| Date: | 2009-04-21 16:19:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20090421161957.GP10358@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions
> > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe:
>
> \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might
> be adequate.
I suggested this to Bruce over IM:
\df[antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions
(one line only, removing the second redundant line). This seems
clea[nr]er to me. Bruce says it would confuse users. But really, if
you can understand the [S+] stuff you should be able to get the [antw]
stuff too, right?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vacuum | 2009-04-21 16:23:28 | Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax |
| Previous Message | steven king | 2009-04-21 16:17:43 | Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax |