Re: Unicode support

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, - - <crossroads0000(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Unicode support
Date: 2009-04-15 16:21:18
Message-ID: 20090415162118.GB25373@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:32:57AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> I've no idea what it would require, but the mapping table must be
> pretty substantial. Still, I'd love to have this functionality in the
> database.

The Unicode tables in ICU outweigh the size of the code by a factor 5
or so. Once Postgres decides it want to do unicode properly and thus
imports the tables in some way, it could get the code to work with it
for 20% extra.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-15 16:34:12 Re: [GENERAL] Performance of full outer join in 8.3
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2009-04-15 16:11:12 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world