| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-11 23:37:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20090411233746.GC29564@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:35:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > It occurs to me that we ought to allow for a possibility that a
> > function can be more than one special case. For example, sum() is
> > both an aggregate and a windowing function, while rank() is only a
> > windowing function.
>
> If it makes the display even one character wider, -1 from me.
> That's a purely hypothetical problem for the classification
> we're discussing. (No, I don't feel a need for \df to remind
> me every time that aggregates can also be window functions.)
OK :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-04-12 01:10:07 | on gettext plural support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-11 23:35:54 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |