| From: | Richard Boulton <richard(at)lemurconsulting(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Grant Ingersoll <gsingers(at)apache(dot)org>, snowball-discuss(at)lists(dot)tartarus(dot)org, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ? |
| Date: | 2009-04-01 22:22:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20090401222242.GA24107@meerkat |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:41:53PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Richard Boulton wrote:
>> As I understand it, ASL 2 is incompatible with GPL 2, at least according to
>> the FSF. This would be a showstopper problem for me.
>
> Er, what does Postgres have that is covered by GPL2?
I think cross posting has confused this thread - I was talking about
snowball not postgres. I don't use postgres at all; in fact, I'm not sure
why this thread was copied to pgsql-hackers at all - sorry for the noise if
there wasn't a good reason.
What I mean is that I use snowball in a project which is GPL-2, and cannot
be relicensed, and snowball changing to ASL 2 would be a showstopper
problem for me for that reason.
--
Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-01 23:57:17 | Re: protect dll lib initialisation against any exception, for 8.5 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-01 22:08:46 | Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ? |