| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shrish Purohit <shrish_purohit(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, Amit Gupta <amit(dot)pc(dot)gupta(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Extension of Thick Indexes |
| Date: | 2009-03-19 20:36:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20090319203627.GO8874@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus escribió:
> Also, for people not familiar with Gokul's work, can you give us an
> explanation of the theory and implementation for this?
It would be helpful to explain how this solves the lack of atomicity of
visibility data updates, which last time I checked was the killer
problem for this feature.
(It'd be good to do this in good ol' plain text email without resorting
to compressed files on random text formats)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-03-19 21:25:26 | Re: pg_restore --multi-thread |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-03-19 20:26:47 | Re: hstore improvements? |