Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
Date: 2009-03-18 19:45:52
Message-ID: 200903182145.53694.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 17 March 2009 20:02:14 Tom Lane wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> > [ use Solaris' version of getopt_long ]
>
> The reason not to do that was discussed in this thread:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org//pgsql-patches/2008-02/msg00075.php

That discussion was about option parsing in postgres/postmaster, which does
not use getopt_long at all.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-03-18 19:51:36 Re: gettext, plural form and translation
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-03-18 19:33:19 Re: Immediate shutdown and system(3)