From: | Jan-Peter(dot)Seifert(at)gmx(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: getting 'full' names of functions? |
Date: | 2009-03-05 16:41:49 |
Message-ID: | 20090305164149.228110@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hello raf,
> > > Easier is just
> > > select oid::regprocedure from pg_proc where <whatever>
> note that this method doesn't produce a complete function
> signature. the precision and scale of numerics are not
> included in the output. hopefully, that won't matter for
> your needs.
Oh. So functions expecting e.g. numeric(5,2) as argument wouldn't be listed correctly? Is this going to be fixed then? For now all I need is the 'full' function name necessary for GRANT/REVOKE.
I guess this will do for now for 'non-numeric'-functions?:
SELECT DISTINCT p.oid::regprocedure::text FROM pg_catalog.pg_proc p LEFT JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace n ON n.oid = p.pronamespace WHERE nspname !~* '^pg_' AND nspname != 'information_schema'
Thank you very much,
Peter
--
Computer Bild Tarifsieger! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL
für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-05 18:45:17 | Re: getting 'full' names of functions? |
Previous Message | Jan-Peter.Seifert | 2009-03-05 16:23:01 | Re: getting 'full' names of functions? |