Re: A single escape required for log_filename

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: A single escape required for log_filename
Date: 2009-02-06 17:44:48
Message-ID: 200902061744.n16HimW03604@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2009 05:23:53 Tom Lane wrote:
> > However, since there's no standard strftime escape for epoch,
> > Robert's proposal to rip out the functionality would break any existing
> > code that still depends on this formatting option.
>
> If it came down to this, then I'd say rip it out. Naming log files by epoch
> isn't exactly a user-friendly practice anyway, and there are equivalent but
> more readable formatting options available.

Are we doing anything about this for 8.4?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-02-06 18:04:47 Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-06 17:43:42 Re: Mention CITEXT in the FAQ